Twitter Constant Struggles, New Partnerships and New Experiments
what the US media tries to spin as "mass uprisings against socialism" in Cuba VS the actual real-life mass socialist movement in Cuba that the US media will tell any lie to stop you from finding out about pic.twitter.com/oY8E8Aw7QC
— Rosa Astra (@morganastra) July 11, 2021
Earlier this month, several Twitter accounts that looked like they belonged to legitimate news organisations posted similar tweets claiming that an American journalist had been executed by members of the Taliban in Kabul:
Source: Archive Today via PolitiFact |
The post above shows one of the fake BBC accounts tweeting about the man’s death in Kabul. Highlighting the problems in sharing information from accounts that are not verified.
PolitiFact analysed these sources and found that the supposedly executed man’s name had popped up in searches dating back to August 2020. He was previously reported to be a possible victim of the fuel explosion in Lebanon. Both accounts, along with the man himself, proved to be entirely fictional. The accounts responsible for manufacturing the story have been suspended.
While Twitter has been known to flag up, remove and dilute the visibility of problematic tweets, demonstrated throughout the presidential election. Many tweets by former President Donald Trump failed to meet the community guidelines. In an effort to cancel out fraudulent information with correct information, Twitter would often embed a hyperlink below to redirect users to informed sources.
Source: The Yucatan Times |
According to Social Media Today, changes to Twitter’s labelling system are underway. Twitter is in the testing process for a three-tier process in an effort to reduce the spread of misinformation. The labelling features will be split into three alerts: Get the Latest, Stay Informed, and Misleading. The first to accommodate fast-changing news reports, with links to find out the newest information. The second relating to evolving and ongoing news stories, for example, COVID-19, where links to key authorities will be embedded in case information is not 100% accurate. Misleading will be applied to disinformation to warn readers that tweets are deliberately fallacious.
Source: Social Media Today |
It is unclear yet how the misleading label will work in the long run, and whether it will make any difference to false information spreading on the platform. If people are still able to interact with the tweet and even see the tweet then the misinformation, even if addressed, still exists on the site. Another problem with Twitter’s labelling system, in general, is that they don’t seem to have much impact on narratives from key figures. On many occasions, fake news can travel faster than legitimate news, and Donald Trump is a notable case study of this problem on social media. CNBC covered the story in January this year and claimed that, in fact, the election falsehoods stated by Trump became his most popular tweets. It is difficult for the public to put their trust in social media, with worries that platforms are never fully politically impartial, and that being politically neutral is more of an illusion than a reality. Whether those views and perceptions of social media platforms have a substantial basis is unclear.